Triple
T12904939
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arizona ballot collection law (H.B. 2023) |
E308706
|
entity |
| Predicate | policyJustification |
P11285
|
FINISHED |
| Object | election integrity |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: election integrity | Statement: [Arizona ballot collection law (H.B. 2023), policyJustification, election integrity]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: policyJustification Context triple: [Arizona ballot collection law (H.B. 2023), policyJustification, election integrity]
-
A.
officialJustification
Indicates the formally stated reason or rationale that an authority or institution gives to legitimize an action, decision, or policy.
-
B.
justification
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides a reason, explanation, or supporting argument for the existence, validity, or appropriateness of another entity or claim.
-
C.
policyBasis
Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational rationale, authority, or guiding principle upon which a policy or rule is established or justified.
-
D.
policyImplication
Indicates that one policy, decision, or condition leads to, justifies, or necessitates another policy outcome or course of action.
-
E.
justificationUsedBy
Indicates that a particular justification is employed or relied upon by a given entity (such as a person, system, or decision).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf92b588190acdf2a2291ac4590 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d971831bd48190b0ecd13e7181bbc6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96fa9b7708190a9e9fa30f59ff580 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:40 p.m.