Triple

T12900502
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject GNU ELPA E308598 entity
Predicate curationLevel P107343 FINISHED
Object curated LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: curated | Statement: [GNU ELPA, curationLevel, curated]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: curationLevel
Context triple: [GNU ELPA, curationLevel, curated]
  • A. curationType
    Indicates the specific manner or method by which something has been selected, organized, or managed within a curated collection or context.
  • B. curationStatus
    Indicates the current stage or condition of an item within a curation or review workflow (e.g., pending, approved, rejected, or in progress).
  • C. curatedAt
    Indicates the time or context at which an item was intentionally selected, organized, or assembled as part of a curated collection or set.
  • D. curatedIn
    Indicates that an entity has been intentionally selected, organized, or managed for inclusion within a particular collection, exhibition, or curated context.
  • E. curatedFor
    Indicates that something has been selectively organized, chosen, or tailored specifically to suit the needs, interests, or context of a particular target entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf7c1f0819098102569a8d8cbf5 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d97180ee708190b60a3e58c42f764f completed April 10, 2026, 9:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d96fa776648190b9b5c30722ea50b6 completed April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d9713e45a88190acd346f066093550 completed April 10, 2026, 9:53 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:40 p.m.