Triple
T1282435
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | William Wrigley Jr. |
E27355
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBrand |
P1500
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Juicy Fruit |
E130795
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Juicy Fruit | Statement: [William Wrigley Jr., hasBrand, Juicy Fruit]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Juicy Fruit Context triple: [William Wrigley Jr., hasBrand, Juicy Fruit]
-
A.
Juicy Fruit
chosen
Juicy Fruit is a long-running fruit-flavored chewing gum brand produced by Wrigley, known for its distinctive sweet taste and bright yellow packaging.
-
B.
Wrigley’s Spearmint
Wrigley’s Spearmint is a classic spearmint-flavored chewing gum brand known for its long-lasting flavor and iconic green packaging.
-
C.
Fanta
Fanta is a globally popular fruit-flavored soft drink brand known for its bright colors and wide variety of flavors.
-
D.
Jelly
Jelly is a now-defunct Q&A and search app that let users get answers by sending questions, often with images, to a network of people.
-
E.
Choladas
"Choladas" is a track from the album "Voice of the Xtabay," likely reflecting the record’s distinctive blend of exotic, atmospheric, and Latin-influenced music.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a496d3710c8190955dee8bc0dacb50 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4c0b47be08190828a1c0a11d94ce8 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:41 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69acacba08f881909230c2d9459d4bc4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 10:54 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:50 p.m.