Triple

T12817375
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Euromos E306435 entity
Predicate hasPreservedElements P89335 FINISHED
Object standing temple columns LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: standing temple columns | Statement: [Euromos, hasPreservedElements, standing temple columns]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPreservedElements
Context triple: [Euromos, hasPreservedElements, standing temple columns]
  • A. hasPreservationType
    Indicates the specific method or category of preservation applied to an entity (e.g., how it is stored, conserved, or kept intact).
  • B. hasPreservedMachinery
    Indicates that an entity retains machinery that has been kept in its original or functional condition rather than removed or replaced.
  • C. somePreservedAs
    Indicates that at least one part or instance of an entity is kept or maintained in a particular state, form, or condition.
  • D. hasSurvivingElement chosen
    Indicates that an entity retains at least one remaining or extant part, instance, or component that still exists.
  • E. preservesFragmentsOf
    Indicates that one entity maintains, protects, or keeps intact partial remains or pieces of another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf46c448190b1faa55aaacb6317 completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d96e9d00088190ac0f5d60e1de7a7c completed April 10, 2026, 9:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d9640ed7448190b276e7fab649f7d2 completed April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:31 p.m.