Triple
T127741
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | English Channel |
E2585
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasStrongFeature |
P182
|
FINISHED |
| Object | strong tides |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: strong tides | Statement: [English Channel, hasStrongFeature, strong tides]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStrongFeature Context triple: [English Channel, hasStrongFeature, strong tides]
-
A.
hasFeature
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or includes a particular characteristic, attribute, or component.
-
B.
supportsFeature
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
C.
hasNotableFeature
Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic, trait, or attribute that is considered significant or noteworthy.
-
D.
hasSupported
Indicates that one entity has provided assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity, either materially, emotionally, or through advocacy.
-
E.
hasCharacteristic
Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is defined by a particular attribute, feature, or quality.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2520c0f3481908b0ed054a2fca8d0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25763ccf8819094e8dffb2ff98480 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:48 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2564c11208190ad25495609d94d87 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:30 a.m.