Triple
T12768177
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Angelica |
E305177
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipStatusWithJackSparrow |
P106800
|
FINISHED |
| Object | complicated |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: complicated | Statement: [Angelica, relationshipStatusWithJackSparrow, complicated]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipStatusWithJackSparrow Context triple: [Angelica, relationshipStatusWithJackSparrow, complicated]
-
A.
relationshipToJackBrown
Indicates the specific familial, social, or professional relationship that an entity has to Jack Brown.
-
B.
relationshipToAhab
Indicates the specific type of personal or social connection an entity has with Ahab.
-
C.
hasProtagonistRelationship
Indicates that there exists a central, story-driving relationship involving the protagonist and another entity within a narrative.
-
D.
relationshipStatusWithMichael
Indicates the type or state of the relationship that an entity currently has with Michael.
-
E.
relationshipToPawneeNation
Indicates the specific type of familial, legal, historical, or political relationship that an entity has with the Pawnee Nation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf2b43c819098ae5aa68e61ea58 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d96df3b2f88190b37b696400178795 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96409739881909174ba005a986cb5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d96d87078c819083ea724238992204 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:28 p.m.