Triple

T12755639
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Frank Palko E304851 entity
Predicate roleIn P161 FINISHED
Object Palko v. Connecticut E54706 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Palko v. Connecticut | Statement: [Frank Palko, roleIn, Palko v. Connecticut]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Palko v. Connecticut
Context triple: [Frank Palko, roleIn, Palko v. Connecticut]
  • A. Palko v. Connecticut chosen
    Palko v. Connecticut is a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped define the doctrine of selective incorporation by holding that only certain fundamental rights in the Bill of Rights apply to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • B. Cantwell v. Connecticut
    Cantwell v. Connecticut is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that first applied the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to the states, striking down a state law that improperly restricted religious proselytizing.
  • C. Alden v. Maine
    Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
  • D. Apprendi v. New Jersey
    Apprendi v. New Jersey is a landmark 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that any fact (other than a prior conviction) that increases a criminal defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • E. Chiafalo v. Washington
    Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d7bdf1fcd081909ffb0e0d6fa3a07d completed April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d96d8b57b88190b29b8fdca415c81c completed April 10, 2026, 9:37 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f67c9aa6308190bfcb1511a561c0f9 completed May 2, 2026, 10:37 p.m.
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:27 p.m.