Triple
T12740898
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Constitutional Tribunal of Poland |
E304485
|
entity |
| Predicate | judgesReappointment |
P106659
|
FINISHED |
| Object | not eligible for reappointment |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: not eligible for reappointment | Statement: [Constitutional Tribunal of Poland, judgesReappointment, not eligible for reappointment]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judgesReappointment Context triple: [Constitutional Tribunal of Poland, judgesReappointment, not eligible for reappointment]
-
A.
judgesElected
Indicates that the judges in question attained their positions through an electoral process rather than by appointment or other means.
-
B.
appointingAuthorityForJudges
Indicates the entity that has the official power or responsibility to appoint judges.
-
C.
appointmentOfJusticesBy
Indicates that one entity has the authority or role of appointing justices to a court or judicial body.
-
D.
reappointedHolder
Indicates that an entity is again assigned or confirmed to hold a position, role, or office that it previously occupied.
-
E.
judgeAppointmentBy
Indicates that one entity is appointed to the role of judging or evaluating another entity by a specific authority or process.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf1426c8190a4402e1c4cdec33a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d96d89ea70819098c470344f172167 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d96406e97c8190b79081039847115c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:56 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69d96d87078c819083ea724238992204 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:26 p.m.