Triple
T12740506
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ciechanów County |
E304475
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsRuralGmina |
P46876
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gmina Opinogóra Górna |
E1001203
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gmina Opinogóra Górna | Statement: [Ciechanów County, containsRuralGmina, Gmina Opinogóra Górna]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gmina Opinogóra Górna Context triple: [Ciechanów County, containsRuralGmina, Gmina Opinogóra Górna]
-
A.
Gmina Opinogóra Górna
chosen
Gmina Opinogóra Górna is a rural administrative district in east-central Poland, located in the Masovian Voivodeship.
-
B.
Gmina Górno
Gmina Górno is a rural administrative district in south-central Poland, located in the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
-
C.
Gmina Morąg
Gmina Morąg is an urban-rural administrative district in northern Poland’s Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship, centered on the town of Morąg.
-
D.
Gmina Gnojno
Gmina Gnojno is a rural administrative district in south-central Poland, located within the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship.
-
E.
Gmina Rozogi
Gmina Rozogi is a rural administrative district in northern Poland, located in the Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf1426c8190a4402e1c4cdec33a |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d96facb2d48190bc12efc00c9da360 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 9:46 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f684eba2508190966d084cc21dc1ea |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:26 p.m.