Triple
T12714764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Connecticut Route 10 |
E303807
|
entity |
| Predicate | passesThrough |
P225
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Granby |
E297347
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Granby | Statement: [Connecticut Route 10, passesThrough, Granby]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Granby Context triple: [Connecticut Route 10, passesThrough, Granby]
-
A.
Granby
chosen
Granby is a small New England town in northern Connecticut known for its rural character, historic charm, and proximity to the Massachusetts border.
-
B.
Granby
Granby is a small town in north-central Colorado known as a gateway to the Rocky Mountains and nearby outdoor recreation areas.
-
C.
Granby, Massachusetts
Granby, Massachusetts is a small town in Hampshire County known for its rural character and proximity to the scenic Mount Holyoke Range in western New England.
-
D.
Grafton
Grafton is a suburban village in Ozaukee County, Wisconsin, known for its proximity to Milwaukee and its mix of residential neighborhoods, commercial areas, and access to the Milwaukee River.
-
E.
Grafton
Grafton is a small rural village located within the district of West Oxfordshire in England.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdf084148190ab9d513dc0735af4 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9620a7554819083784897ff690652 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:48 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f69b8a79488190aaf95d4f2e20a7bc |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:49 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:23 p.m.