Triple
T12692011
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Town of Utica |
E303228
|
entity |
| Predicate | county |
P75
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hinds County |
E63006
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hinds County | Statement: [Town of Utica, county, Hinds County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hinds County Context triple: [Town of Utica, county, Hinds County]
-
A.
Hinds County
chosen
Hinds County is a county in central Mississippi that includes the state capital, Jackson, and serves as a major governmental and economic hub of the state.
-
B.
Bailey County
Bailey County is a rural county in the western Texas Panhandle known for its agricultural economy and small communities.
-
C.
Winston County
Winston County is a rural county in northwestern Alabama known historically for its Unionist stance during the Civil War and its location within the state's hill country.
-
D.
Choctaw County
Choctaw County is a rural county in southwestern Alabama known for its pine forests, timber industry, and small, close-knit communities.
-
E.
Elmore County
Elmore County is a county in central Alabama known for its mix of suburban communities, rural areas, and proximity to the Montgomery metropolitan region.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdef90d48190b46b88270e780946 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d961dbc91c8190bec50797bbd593db |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:47 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f72658fa6c81909b9785d710c418e0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:22 p.m.