Triple

T1267151
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property E15626 entity
Predicate coversSubjectMatter P450 FINISHED
Object patents LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: patents | Statement: [Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, coversSubjectMatter, patents]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coversSubjectMatter
Context triple: [Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, coversSubjectMatter, patents]
  • A. subjectMatterScope
    Indicates the thematic or topical domain that an action, statement, or resource pertains to or falls within.
  • B. subjectMatter chosen
    Indicates the topic, theme, or content area that something (such as a work, document, or discussion) is about.
  • C. isSubjectTo
    Indicates that one entity is governed, affected, or constrained by the authority, rules, conditions, or influence of another entity.
  • D. usesResearchSubject
    Indicates that one entity employs or utilizes another entity as a research subject in a study or investigation.
  • E. subjectCanBe
    Indicates that the subject has the potential or capability to assume, become, or be classified as the specified object or state.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4935a94308190bb92555b79032824 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c037f14c8190baa42f70f8846583 completed March 1, 2026, 10:39 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bede52a081909665d60acbe41d31 completed March 1, 2026, 10:34 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:50 p.m.