Triple
T12658457
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kili language |
E302349
|
entity |
| Predicate | alternativeNameStatus |
P19196
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lesser-known Tungusic variety |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lesser-known Tungusic variety | Statement: [Kili language, alternativeNameStatus, lesser-known Tungusic variety]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alternativeNameStatus Context triple: [Kili language, alternativeNameStatus, lesser-known Tungusic variety]
-
A.
nameStatus
chosen
Indicates the status or condition associated with an entity’s name, such as whether it is current, preferred, alternate, or deprecated.
-
B.
designationStatus
Indicates the current official classification or standing assigned to an entity within a defined system or process.
-
C.
knownAsBy
Indicates that one entity is referred to or recognized by another entity using a particular name or designation.
-
D.
exonymStatus
Indicates the status or classification of a name used in one language to refer to a place, people, or entity known by a different name in its own language.
-
E.
canonicalStatus
Indicates the formal or official standing of an entity within an established authoritative or normative system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bded71a88190bb76e2413af9ea66 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9617b07ec8190b714f04ae6654060 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d960b78ce8819091f15dd5013e6da5 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:19 p.m.