Triple
T12655
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | California quail |
E255
|
entity |
| Predicate | authority |
P1330
|
FINISHED |
| Object | (Shaw, 1798) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: (Shaw, 1798) | Statement: [California quail, authority, (Shaw, 1798)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: authority Context triple: [California quail, authority, (Shaw, 1798)]
-
A.
allows
Indicates that one entity grants permission, capability, or opportunity for another entity to perform an action or be in a certain state.
-
B.
grantedTo
Indicates that a right, permission, or resource has been formally given or assigned by one party to another.
-
C.
role
Indicates the function, position, or responsibility that one entity holds in relation to another within a given context.
-
D.
appointedBy
Indicates that one entity has been formally selected or assigned to a position, role, or office by another entity.
-
E.
status
Indicates the current condition, state, or standing of an entity within a given context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a23d7ad88c8190bffe8ab091d86642 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 12:57 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a243abb2ec8190937365e5ecec52ad |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a23fe9470c8190918a6ca1df168646 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a243aa85848190813154e8a6495200 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:23 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:02 a.m.