Triple
T12644718
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hutchinson County |
E301992
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Stinnett, Texas |
E1077729
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Stinnett, Texas | Statement: [Hutchinson County, contains, Stinnett, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Stinnett, Texas Context triple: [Hutchinson County, contains, Stinnett, Texas]
-
A.
Stinnett, Texas
chosen
Stinnett, Texas is a small city in the Texas Panhandle that serves as an administrative and service hub for the surrounding rural area.
-
B.
Stanton, Texas
Stanton, Texas is a small West Texas city that serves as the administrative and commercial hub of Martin County.
-
C.
Millican, Texas
Millican, Texas is a small rural community in east-central Texas known for its historic role as an early railroad town.
-
D.
Van Alstyne, Texas
Van Alstyne, Texas is a small North Texas city known for its historic downtown, rural charm, and growing role as a bedroom community between Sherman and the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex.
-
E.
Navasota, Texas
Navasota, Texas is a small city in Grimes County that serves as a historic railroad and commercial hub within the Greater Houston metropolitan area.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdec9f9c8190b4bac675b7588211 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9614bf2f881909976becdf747f4fb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fcd084d94081909ae911fce5640aaf |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:17 p.m.