Triple
T12621449
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Treaty of Fort Pitt (1778) |
E301387
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesIdea |
P1393
|
FINISHED |
| Object | potential admission of a Lenape state into the United States |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: potential admission of a Lenape state into the United States | Statement: [Treaty of Fort Pitt (1778), includesIdea, potential admission of a Lenape state into the United States]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesIdea Context triple: [Treaty of Fort Pitt (1778), includesIdea, potential admission of a Lenape state into the United States]
-
A.
coreIdea
Indicates the central concept or primary message that underlies or unifies something, such as a text, argument, or work.
-
B.
includes
chosen
Indicates that one entity contains, encompasses, or has another entity as a part, member, or subset.
-
C.
anticipatesIdeaIn
Indicates that one entity expects, predicts, or foresees the idea or concept that will be introduced or held by another entity in a given context.
-
D.
issueIncludes
Indicates that an issue or problem encompasses, contains, or involves a specified element, component, or sub-issue as part of its scope.
-
E.
hasAuthorIdea
Indicates that an author is associated with or responsible for originating a particular idea.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bdeaf49c8190b13800111fa77ea3 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9617b07ec8190b714f04ae6654060 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d960b195108190ac25bd95e644ace4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 8:42 p.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:14 p.m.