Triple
T12586175
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | M-43 |
E300467
|
entity |
| Predicate | passesThrough |
P225
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hastings, Michigan |
E691300
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hastings, Michigan | Statement: [M-43, passesThrough, Hastings, Michigan]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hastings, Michigan Context triple: [M-43, passesThrough, Hastings, Michigan]
-
A.
Hastings, Michigan
chosen
Hastings, Michigan is a small city in southwestern Michigan known for its historic downtown, community events, and role as a regional service and cultural center.
-
B.
Hart, Michigan
Hart, Michigan is a small city in western Michigan that serves as the administrative and commercial hub of rural Oceana County.
-
C.
Hartford, Michigan
Hartford, Michigan is a small city in southwestern Michigan known for its rural character, agricultural surroundings, and proximity to major regional transportation routes.
-
D.
Hopkins, Michigan
Hopkins, Michigan is a small rural village located in Allegan County in the southwestern part of the state.
-
E.
Hanover, Michigan
Hanover, Michigan is a small rural village in south-central Michigan known for its close-knit community and location within Jackson County.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d7bde87b648190bcd0266e9efde098 |
completed | April 9, 2026, 2:55 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d954bbe72c8190aa11090bb6b480c9 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:51 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69fd32359c54819098349d7d1c1e454f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 9, 2026, 5:05 p.m.