Triple
T125771
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | English barons |
E2546
|
entity |
| Predicate | exercisedPowerOver |
P6502
|
FINISHED |
| Object | knights |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: knights | Statement: [English barons, exercisedPowerOver, knights]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: exercisedPowerOver Context triple: [English barons, exercisedPowerOver, knights]
-
A.
exclusivePower
Indicates that one entity holds sole authority or control over another entity or a specific domain, excluding others from sharing that power.
-
B.
hasLegislativePower
Indicates that an entity possesses the authority to create, amend, or repeal laws within a given jurisdiction or governing framework.
-
C.
majorPowerIn
Indicates that an entity holds significant political, economic, or military influence within a specified domain, region, or context.
-
D.
occupyingPower
Indicates that one entity holds military or political control over a territory that it does not legally own, typically as an occupying authority.
-
E.
cameToPowerThrough
Indicates the manner or process by which an entity attained authority, leadership, or control, specifying how it rose to power.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a251b54ea88190b18281669f59b4c0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:23 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25760af348190bf402089c240887d |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:48 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2564c11208190ad25495609d94d87 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a2575d8a648190ad8e10d4b04e5e07 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m.