Triple
T12568634
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ripon Falls |
E295539
|
entity |
| Predicate | wasConsidered |
P1120
|
FINISHED |
| Object | one of the sources of the Nile River |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: one of the sources of the Nile River | Statement: [Ripon Falls, wasConsidered, one of the sources of the Nile River]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasConsidered Context triple: [Ripon Falls, wasConsidered, one of the sources of the Nile River]
-
A.
considered
chosen
Indicates that one entity regards, judges, or thinks about another entity in a particular way or context.
-
B.
consideredIn
Indicates that one entity is taken into account, examined, or included as a factor within the context, scope, or decision framework of another entity.
-
C.
nowConsidered
Indicates that something has come to be regarded or classified in a particular way at the present time, possibly differing from how it was regarded before.
-
D.
couldConsider
Indicates that one entity has the potential or option to take another entity into account when making a decision, judgment, or evaluation.
-
E.
wasA
Indicates that an entity previously had a certain role, type, or classification in the past.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ad9cac2c81908e8a7bed82d1e21d |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9550d84908190aea0f50055f6d92e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d95414692881909c52a1de7d224b44 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 11:50 p.m.