Triple
T12557339
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Upminster |
E295251
|
entity |
| Predicate | liesToTheSouthOf |
P9676
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cranham |
E744248
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cranham | Statement: [Upminster, liesToTheSouthOf, Cranham]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cranham Context triple: [Upminster, liesToTheSouthOf, Cranham]
-
A.
Cranham
chosen
Cranham is a suburban residential area in the outer east of Greater London, known for its green spaces and village-like character within the London Borough of Havering.
-
B.
Cavenham
Cavenham is a small rural village and civil parish in Suffolk, England, known for its surrounding heathland and agricultural landscape.
-
C.
Crookham
Crookham is a small village in Berkshire, England, situated near the town of Thatcham.
-
D.
Cretingham
Cretingham is a small rural village and civil parish in the English county of Suffolk, known for its historic church and countryside setting.
-
E.
Peacham
Peacham is a small historic town in Vermont known for its rural New England character and scenic landscapes.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ad9cac2c81908e8a7bed82d1e21d |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d95491d9688190a6b88a939124233e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:50 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f655895c9c819082f41e79906567c6 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 11:47 p.m.