Triple

T125523
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Black Reports E2539 entity
Predicate legalAuthorityLevel P4976 FINISHED
Object secondary source LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: secondary source | Statement: [Black Reports, legalAuthorityLevel, secondary source]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalAuthorityLevel
Context triple: [Black Reports, legalAuthorityLevel, secondary source]
  • A. legalBasis
    Indicates the legal rule, authority, or justification under which an action, decision, or status is established or carried out.
  • B. legalRecognition
    Indicates that an authority formally acknowledges the validity, status, or rights associated with an entity, relationship, or action under the law.
  • C. legalStandardHistoricallyAssociatedWith
    Indicates that a particular legal standard has been historically linked or traditionally associated with another legal concept, practice, or context.
  • D. hasLegalStatus
    Indicates that an entity possesses a particular legal classification, recognition, or standing under law.
  • E. legalSubject
    Indicates that an entity is the bearer of legal rights, duties, or responsibilities within a legal relationship or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a251b54ea88190b18281669f59b4c0 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:23 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2573e4e6481908252dfef2e34f46e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2564a54948190ba30bee858173b27 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a256ea776081908fec36c3fdfb8d84 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:46 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m.