Triple

T1254593
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Quo primum E26957 entity
Predicate legalFormulation P4756 FINISHED
Object threat of divine and canonical penalties for violators LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: threat of divine and canonical penalties for violators | Statement: [Quo primum, legalFormulation, threat of divine and canonical penalties for violators]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalFormulation
Context triple: [Quo primum, legalFormulation, threat of divine and canonical penalties for violators]
  • A. legalForm
    Indicates the specific legal structure or organizational type under which an entity is formally constituted and recognized by law.
  • B. legalConcept
    Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
  • C. legalContext
    Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within, is shaped by, or is relevant to a specific legal framework, proceeding, or set of legal norms.
  • D. legalDoctrine chosen
    Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
  • E. logicalForm
    Indicates a relationship where an expression is associated with its structured, formal logical representation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49487a9c48190ba9b05348fd1b53f completed March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bfa5a4cc819093ed686619b572d8 completed March 1, 2026, 10:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bb6c977c8190a2bf3e8b67a59beb completed March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:47 p.m.