Triple

T12527770
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Woodson v. North Carolina E299482 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Gregg v. Georgia E53067 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gregg v. Georgia | Statement: [Woodson v. North Carolina, relatedCase, Gregg v. Georgia]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gregg v. Georgia
Context triple: [Woodson v. North Carolina, relatedCase, Gregg v. Georgia]
  • A. Gregg v. Georgia chosen
    Gregg v. Georgia is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reinstated the death penalty under revised statutes, holding that capital punishment is constitutional under certain guided-discretion procedures.
  • B. Jackson v. Georgia
    Jackson v. Georgia is a United States Supreme Court case that, alongside Furman v. Georgia, addressed the constitutionality and application of the death penalty under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
  • C. Chisholm v. Georgia
    Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
  • D. Edwards v. South Carolina
    Edwards v. South Carolina is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision that overturned the breach-of-the-peace convictions of civil rights demonstrators, affirming their First Amendment rights to peaceful protest and assembly.
  • E. Bostock v. Clayton County
    Bostock v. Clayton County is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held federal employment discrimination law protects employees from being fired for being gay or transgender.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ada5cdd48190860d9ce30aff69be completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9545e90948190980bd4d64964a0f2 completed April 10, 2026, 7:49 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f655762ae88190ab41e23bbd65c566 completed May 2, 2026, 7:50 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.