Triple

T12511534
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Public Law 100-497 E299088 entity
Predicate motivatedBy P79 FINISHED
Object California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987) E613635 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987) | Statement: [Public Law 100-497, motivatedBy, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987)
Context triple: [Public Law 100-497, motivatedBy, California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987)]
  • A. California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987) chosen
    California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians (1987) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed tribal sovereignty by limiting state regulation of gaming activities on Native American reservations.
  • B. Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe (1978)
    Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe (1978) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that held tribal courts lack criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians, significantly limiting Native American sovereignty and self-governance in criminal matters.
  • C. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States
    Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that denied compensable property rights to an Alaska Native group by relying on the Doctrine of Discovery to limit Indigenous land claims.
  • D. United States v. California (1965)
    United States v. California (1965) is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified federal versus state authority over offshore submerged lands and resources on the Outer Continental Shelf.
  • E. Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.
    Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts Arizona’s requirement that prospective voters provide documentary proof of citizenship when registering using the federal form.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ada4cd388190ae3bbf83ff87057a completed April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9541d6e508190a4992f328e077467 completed April 10, 2026, 7:48 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f64bb94d608190aae4c8ec39556362 completed May 2, 2026, 7:08 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.