Triple
T12504591
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | De substantia foederis gratuiti inter Deum et electos |
E298916
|
entity |
| Predicate | doctrineExpounded |
P15802
|
FINISHED |
| Object | covenant between God and the elect |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: covenant between God and the elect | Statement: [De substantia foederis gratuiti inter Deum et electos, doctrineExpounded, covenant between God and the elect]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: doctrineExpounded Context triple: [De substantia foederis gratuiti inter Deum et electos, doctrineExpounded, covenant between God and the elect]
-
A.
doctrineDiscussed
Indicates that a particular doctrine is the topic of discussion or analysis in a given context or interaction.
-
B.
doctrineExplainedBy
chosen
Indicates that an explanation or interpretation is provided for a particular doctrine by a specified source or agent.
-
C.
doctrineOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
-
D.
doctrineHeld
Indicates that an agent adheres to, supports, or maintains a particular doctrine or set of principles.
-
E.
doctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or set of beliefs is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ada4cd388190ae3bbf83ff87057a |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d94dfcea188190a929db1aabe1a286 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d94d43b7008190af2648fe09fd6d23 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.