Triple

T1249643
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Paying the Cost to Be the Boss E26844 entity
Predicate lyricTopic P4921 FINISHED
Object romantic relationships LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: romantic relationships | Statement: [Paying the Cost to Be the Boss, lyricTopic, romantic relationships]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lyricTopic
Context triple: [Paying the Cost to Be the Boss, lyricTopic, romantic relationships]
  • A. lyricalPerspective
    Indicates the narrative or point of view from which lyrics are expressed in a song or vocal piece.
  • B. hasLyricsTheme
    Indicates that the lyrics of a work primarily concern or revolve around a specified theme or subject.
  • C. hasLyricalTheme chosen
    Indicates that one entity (typically a creative work) features or is characterized by a particular lyrical subject, topic, or theme.
  • D. lyricsBy
    Indicates that the lyrics of a song or musical work were written or authored by a specified person or entity.
  • E. hasLyric
    Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work or track) contains or is associated with the lyrics provided by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49487a9c48190ba9b05348fd1b53f completed March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bf83b32c81908648e5748b897247 completed March 1, 2026, 10:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bb6b075881908e867c25b5080e25 completed March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:47 p.m.