Triple
T12496231
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Criterion E (quantitative analysis) |
E298691
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | extinction risk assessment standard |
C18011
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: extinction risk assessment standard Context triple: [Criterion E (quantitative analysis), instanceOf, extinction risk assessment standard]
-
A.
conservation status
Conservation status is a classification that indicates the likelihood that a species or ecosystem will remain extant in the near future, based on factors such as population trends, threats, and habitat conditions.
-
B.
biodiversity assessment
Biodiversity assessment is the systematic evaluation and measurement of the variety, abundance, and distribution of species, genes, and ecosystems within a defined area to understand ecological health and inform conservation decisions.
-
C.
international conservation status
International conservation status is a classification that indicates the level of risk of extinction faced by a species or ecosystem globally, based on standardized scientific criteria and assessments.
-
D.
risk assessment standard
chosen
A risk assessment standard is a formalized set of principles, criteria, and procedures used to systematically identify, analyze, evaluate, and document risks within a specific domain or industry.
-
E.
endangered species
An endangered species is a type of organism whose population has declined to a critically low level, placing it at high risk of extinction in the near future.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ada4cd388190ae3bbf83ff87057a |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:57 p.m.