Triple

T1249284
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject the Crown E26836 entity
Predicate hasPrerogative P18538 FINISHED
Object royal prerogative LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: royal prerogative | Statement: [the Crown, hasPrerogative, royal prerogative]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPrerogative
Context triple: [the Crown, hasPrerogative, royal prerogative]
  • A. usesAuthorityOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity exercises power, rights, or influence derived from or on behalf of another entity’s authority.
  • B. exercisedPowerOver
    Indicates that one entity exerted control, influence, or authority over another entity.
  • C. hadExecutivePowerIn
    Indicates that an entity held executive authority or governing power within a specified organization, institution, or jurisdiction during a certain period.
  • D. hasLegislativePower
    Indicates that an entity possesses the authority to create, amend, or repeal laws within a given jurisdiction or governing framework.
  • E. authorityGranted
    Indicates that one entity has formally given another entity the power, rights, or permission to act or make decisions, typically within a defined scope or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a49487a9c48190ba9b05348fd1b53f completed March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bf83b32c81908648e5748b897247 completed March 1, 2026, 10:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bb6b075881908e867c25b5080e25 completed March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:47 p.m.