Triple
T124537
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | logical positivism |
E2516
|
entity |
| Predicate | philosophicalDomain |
P3629
|
FINISHED |
| Object | philosophy of science |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: philosophy of science | Statement: [logical positivism, philosophicalDomain, philosophy of science]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: philosophicalDomain Context triple: [logical positivism, philosophicalDomain, philosophy of science]
-
A.
philosophicalTheme
Indicates that a work, idea, or discourse centrally involves or explores a particular philosophical concept, question, or line of thought.
-
B.
philosophicalTradition
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with, belongs to, or is characterized by a particular philosophical school, movement, or line of thought.
-
C.
notablePhilosopher
Indicates that the subject is recognized as a philosopher of particular significance or influence.
-
D.
ontologicalAspect
Indicates a fundamental mode or category of being that characterizes how something exists or is realized.
-
E.
theologicalFocus
Indicates that something is primarily concerned with, centered on, or directed toward theological themes, questions, or doctrines.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a251b54ea88190b18281669f59b4c0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:23 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2573ce0ac8190b49fb31d3d475bf9 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2564a54948190ba30bee858173b27 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m.