Triple
T12445441
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act |
E297384
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasConstitutionalChallenges |
P1122
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, hasConstitutionalChallenges, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasConstitutionalChallenges Context triple: [Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, hasConstitutionalChallenges, true]
-
A.
constitutionalChallenge
chosen
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
B.
hasConstitutionalRights
Indicates that an entity possesses rights or protections guaranteed by a constitution in a given legal or political system.
-
C.
hasConstitutionalDoctrine
Indicates that an entity is associated with, based on, or governed by a particular constitutional doctrine or set of constitutional principles.
-
D.
subjectToConstitution
Indicates that an entity is governed, constrained, or regulated by the rules and principles of a specific constitution.
-
E.
hasConstitutionalBasisIn
Indicates that something derives its legal authority, justification, or foundation from a specific constitutional provision or framework.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ada166c48190b902972cd2408fa3 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d95151e7348190a1d4953a8b416a13 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:36 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d94d3c27a08190a0237200203e476d |
completed | April 10, 2026, 7:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:55 p.m.