Triple
T1239749
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Regional Security System |
E26631
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | regional security alliance |
C89
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: regional security alliance Context triple: [Regional Security System, instanceOf, regional security alliance]
-
A.
collective defense agreement
chosen
A collective defense agreement is a formal pact among multiple states committing each to consider an attack on one member as an attack on all and to respond with coordinated defense measures.
-
B.
trilateral security partners
Trilateral security partners are three sovereign entities that formally coordinate defense, intelligence, and strategic policies to enhance their collective security and regional or global stability.
-
C.
Economic alliance
An economic alliance is a formal or informal partnership between countries or regions designed to promote mutual economic benefits through cooperation in trade, investment, and financial policies.
-
D.
European political alliance
A European political alliance is a cooperative grouping of political parties or states within Europe that coordinate policies, strategies, and actions to advance shared ideological or strategic interests across national borders.
-
E.
NATO military position
A NATO military position is a standardized role or appointment within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s integrated command or force structure, defining specific responsibilities, rank equivalencies, and functions across member nations’ armed forces.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4948689d08190b3a4a3f388c02148 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:47 p.m.