Triple

T12381
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lake Tahoe E249 entity
Predicate hasEnvironmentalIssue P494 FINISHED
Object declining water clarity LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: declining water clarity | Statement: [Lake Tahoe, hasEnvironmentalIssue, declining water clarity]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEnvironmentalIssue
Context triple: [Lake Tahoe, hasEnvironmentalIssue, declining water clarity]
  • A. hasClimate
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is characterized by a particular type of climate or climatic conditions.
  • B. climate
    Indicates a relationship where environmental or atmospheric conditions influence, shape, or characterize something (such as a place, system, or process).
  • C. hasNotableSubject chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a subject that is particularly significant, prominent, or noteworthy in relation to it.
  • D. hasNotableFacility
    Indicates that an entity possesses or hosts a facility that is of particular significance, prominence, or interest.
  • E. hasLimitation
    Indicates that an entity is subject to a constraint, restriction, or boundary that limits its scope, capability, or applicability.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a23d7ad88c8190bffe8ab091d86642 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 12:57 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a241ea1ea081908e8a81ca97531ba5 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a23fe7da8c8190aea795b62cb91621 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:07 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:02 a.m.