Triple
T1237796
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Comforter |
E26585
|
entity |
| Predicate | describesAspectOf |
P662
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ministry of the Holy Spirit |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ministry of the Holy Spirit | Statement: [Comforter, describesAspectOf, ministry of the Holy Spirit]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: describesAspectOf Context triple: [Comforter, describesAspectOf, ministry of the Holy Spirit]
-
A.
describes
Indicates that one entity provides an explanation, representation, or account of another entity or concept.
-
B.
describedIn
Indicates that information about an entity is contained or documented within a specified source, such as a text, document, or media.
-
C.
aspect
Indicates a specific temporal phase or manner in which an action, event, or state unfolds or is viewed (e.g., ongoing, completed, habitual).
-
D.
disputedAspect
Indicates that a particular feature, detail, or component of something is subject to disagreement or contention between parties.
-
E.
characterizedBy
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses a defining quality, feature, or attribute expressed by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a4948571c88190a9191e451e6035fd |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4bf3f07c08190a402e8341c1f38cc |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a4bb67d52c8190815d6356b79d6ed5 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:47 p.m.