Triple
T12375622
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Munger |
E295114
|
entity |
| Predicate | isHistoricSince |
P6054
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ancient period |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ancient period | Statement: [Munger, isHistoricSince, ancient period]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isHistoricSince Context triple: [Munger, isHistoricSince, ancient period]
-
A.
isHistoric
Indicates that something has significant importance or relevance in history, often due to its age, impact, or role in past events.
-
B.
hasHistorySince
Indicates that an entity has maintained a particular state, condition, or relationship continuously starting from a specified point in time.
-
C.
hasHistoricity
Indicates that something possesses historical existence, significance, or authenticity, rather than being purely fictional, mythical, or timeless.
-
D.
hasHistoryPeriod
Indicates that something is associated with, belongs to, or occurs within a specific historical period or era.
-
E.
historicallyRecordedSince
chosen
Indicates that the existence, occurrence, or recognition of one entity has been documented in historical records starting from the time specified by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab6d8a4081908636601e69ddf262 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d93fb8d6c081909e8bbbd52c73f29c |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d93ed256788190b704cad171a4824e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:54 p.m.