Triple

T1236521
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Corinth E26560 entity
Predicate mythicReputation P24829 FINISHED
Object realm of a deceitful king LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: realm of a deceitful king | Statement: [Corinth, mythicReputation, realm of a deceitful king]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mythicReputation
Context triple: [Corinth, mythicReputation, realm of a deceitful king]
  • A. mottoReputation
    Indicates that a particular motto is associated with and characterizes the reputation or public image of an entity.
  • B. tacticalReputation
    Indicates the perceived level of skill, reliability, or effectiveness an entity has in planning and executing tactics within a given context.
  • C. championshipReputation
    Indicates the recognized status or esteem an entity holds based on its history of success or performance in championships or major competitive titles.
  • D. associatedWithReputation
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, influenced by, or characterized in terms of another entity’s reputation or perceived standing.
  • E. criticalReputation
    Indicates that an entity is regarded by critics with a particular level or type of esteem, evaluation, or standing based on critical assessments.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4948571c88190a9191e451e6035fd completed March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bf17e0bc8190a066561e6b629fc0 completed March 1, 2026, 10:35 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4bb67d52c8190815d6356b79d6ed5 completed March 1, 2026, 10:19 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4bbf83584819088c69366f58586cc completed March 1, 2026, 10:21 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:47 p.m.