Triple
T12334694
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gladys Mills Phipps |
E294053
|
entity |
| Predicate | givenName |
P17
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gladys |
E565716
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gladys | Statement: [Gladys Mills Phipps, givenName, Gladys]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gladys Context triple: [Gladys Mills Phipps, givenName, Gladys]
-
A.
Gladys
chosen
Gladys is a feminine given name of English origin that was especially popular in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
-
B.
Gladys Sweet
Gladys Sweet was one of the African American defendants prosecuted alongside her husband in the landmark Ossian Sweet trial, a pivotal civil rights case challenging racial housing segregation in 1920s Detroit.
-
C.
Doris
Doris is the given name of Doris Buffett, an American philanthropist and sister of investor Warren Buffett, known for her charitable work and focus on direct, person-to-person giving.
-
D.
Doris
Doris is an Oceanid from Greek mythology, known as the wife of the sea god Nereus and mother of the Nereids.
-
E.
Doris
Doris was the first wife of Herod the Great and the mother of his son Antipater in the Herodian royal family.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab6ae0dc8190b1522a9c1c55c114 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d93f64ad20819080d99e57833b4b51 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 6:20 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f684d0315c8190988431785a7b1e1e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:53 p.m.