Triple

T12322693
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject AWS Backup E293761 entity
Predicate supportsComplianceReporting P104464 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [AWS Backup, supportsComplianceReporting, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsComplianceReporting
Context triple: [AWS Backup, supportsComplianceReporting, true]
  • A. providesCompliance
    Indicates that one entity supplies or ensures adherence to required rules, standards, or regulations for another entity.
  • B. indicatesComplianceWith
    Indicates that one entity conforms to, satisfies, or adheres to the rules, standards, or requirements specified by another entity or framework.
  • C. evaluatesComplianceWith
    Indicates that one entity assesses whether another entity or its behavior meets specified rules, standards, or requirements.
  • D. hasComplianceStatement
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a formal declaration that it adheres to specified rules, standards, or regulatory requirements.
  • E. complianceRequiredFor
    Indicates that one entity must adhere to or satisfy the rules, standards, or conditions defined by another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab6ae0dc8190b1522a9c1c55c114 completed April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d93f621570819091ee1db2609233ea completed April 10, 2026, 6:20 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d93ec5be788190b82d2edc6a0f1095 completed April 10, 2026, 6:17 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69d93f607a88819089e89fd263ae9937 completed April 10, 2026, 6:20 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:53 p.m.