Triple

T12290577
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tyson–Holyfield II ear-biting incident E292945 entity
Predicate hasRuleInfraction P32803 FINISHED
Object biting opponent LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: biting opponent | Statement: [Tyson–Holyfield II ear-biting incident, hasRuleInfraction, biting opponent]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRuleInfraction
Context triple: [Tyson–Holyfield II ear-biting incident, hasRuleInfraction, biting opponent]
  • A. hasTransgression chosen
    Indicates that one entity has committed, is responsible for, or is associated with a violation, offense, or wrongdoing in relation to another entity or rule.
  • B. hasPunishment
    Indicates that an entity is subject to a specified penalty, sanction, or adverse consequence as a result of some action, condition, or rule.
  • C. violationOf
    Indicates that one entity breaches, disobeys, or infringes upon a rule, law, agreement, or right associated with another entity.
  • D. hasReasonForArrest
    Indicates that an arrest is associated with a specific reason or cause.
  • E. hasFirstConviction
    Indicates that an entity has received its first legal conviction for an offense.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab690ad081908c0ed3870ec82d53 completed April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d9261e1570819084bb4fdb44aa6aea completed April 10, 2026, 4:32 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d91c4d9a9c8190aeb7beaf9792d8f0 completed April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:52 p.m.