Triple
T1228107
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | De Canas v. Bica |
E26372
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullName |
P16
|
FINISHED |
| Object | De Canas et al. v. Bica et al. |
E26372
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: De Canas et al. v. Bica et al. | Statement: [De Canas v. Bica, fullName, De Canas et al. v. Bica et al.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: De Canas et al. v. Bica et al. Context triple: [De Canas v. Bica, fullName, De Canas et al. v. Bica et al.]
-
A.
De Canas v. Bica
chosen
De Canas v. Bica is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a California law regulating the employment of unauthorized immigrants, holding that not all state regulations touching on immigration are preempted by federal law.
-
B.
Baker v. Nelson
Baker v. Nelson was a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that summarily dismissed a same-sex marriage claim, effectively allowing states to ban such marriages until it was later overturned by Obergefell v. Hodges.
-
C.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
D.
Branch v. Texas
Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
-
E.
Canóvanas
Canóvanas is a municipality in northeastern Puerto Rico known for its proximity to San Juan and its blend of suburban communities with rural, mountainous landscapes.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a49484688c8190a1bf285eb396a8b6 |
completed | March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a4be3c5d4c819087f9e9e37204c3be |
completed | March 1, 2026, 10:31 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69ac8a1242048190ba6ffcaacc4ca5d5 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:26 p.m. |
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:47 p.m.