Triple

T12254282
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject IUCN Category III E292058 entity
Predicate typicallySize P28652 FINISHED
Object relatively small protected areas LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: relatively small protected areas | Statement: [IUCN Category III, typicallySize, relatively small protected areas]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicallySize
Context triple: [IUCN Category III, typicallySize, relatively small protected areas]
  • A. typicalDimension
    Indicates that one entity represents a standard or characteristic measurement (such as size, length, or capacity) typically associated with another entity.
  • B. typicalUnitSize
    Indicates the standard or most common size or quantity in which something is typically measured, packaged, or used.
  • C. typicalCastSize
    Indicates the usual or standard number of cast members involved in a production or performance.
  • D. sizeDescription chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity provides descriptive information about the size or scale of another entity.
  • E. typicalPanelSize
    Indicates the usual or standard dimensions associated with a given panel.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab67950c8190be08450a06228c4b completed April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d91d38ee10819093ed41d2954bf4ef completed April 10, 2026, 3:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69d91c46dcd88190a263db30804bff36 completed April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:52 p.m.