Triple
T12251649
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pays Nantais |
E291984
|
entity |
| Predicate | traditionalWinemakingPractice |
P14739
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sur lie aging for Muscadet |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sur lie aging for Muscadet | Statement: [Pays Nantais, traditionalWinemakingPractice, sur lie aging for Muscadet]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalWinemakingPractice Context triple: [Pays Nantais, traditionalWinemakingPractice, sur lie aging for Muscadet]
-
A.
traditionalVinification
chosen
Indicates that a wine is produced using traditional or historically established winemaking methods rather than modern or industrial techniques.
-
B.
commonVinification
Indicates that two wines share the same or very similar vinification (winemaking) process.
-
C.
hasWineMakingTradition
Indicates that a place or group has an established, culturally recognized history and practice of producing wine.
-
D.
traditionalGrapeVariety
Indicates that a grape variety is traditionally or historically used in a specific region, wine style, or cultural winemaking practice.
-
E.
vinificationUse
Indicates the process or method of winemaking applied to a given wine or batch.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab67950c8190be08450a06228c4b |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d91d38ee10819093ed41d2954bf4ef |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d91c46dcd88190a263db30804bff36 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:52 p.m.