Triple
T12235233
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Senat |
E291572
|
entity |
| Predicate | canInitiateConstitutionalAmendments |
P15654
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Senat, canInitiateConstitutionalAmendments, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canInitiateConstitutionalAmendments Context triple: [Senat, canInitiateConstitutionalAmendments, true]
-
A.
canAmendConstitution
Indicates that an entity has the authority or power to modify or revise a constitution.
-
B.
allowsConstitutionalConvention
chosen
Indicates that an authority or legal framework permits the initiation or holding of a constitutional convention to draft, revise, or replace a constitution.
-
C.
canAmendBills
Indicates that an entity has the authority or ability to modify, revise, or propose changes to bills.
-
D.
canInitiateLegislation
Indicates that the subject has the authority or power to formally propose or introduce new legislation or legal measures.
-
E.
proposedAmendment
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested a change or addition (an amendment) to another entity, such as a document, law, or agreement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab668acc8190963ba424049d6aee |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d924a3973c8190a882046963b320fb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 4:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d91c41bcbc81909782f4e3c571b218 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:51 p.m.