Triple
T12181978
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sebeș |
E290242
|
entity |
| Predicate | river |
P165
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sebeș River |
E872729
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sebeș River | Statement: [Sebeș, river, Sebeș River]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Sebeș River Context triple: [Sebeș, river, Sebeș River]
-
A.
Sebeș River
chosen
The Sebeș River is a tributary watercourse that flows through central Romania, contributing to the larger Mureș (Maros) River system.
-
B.
Gheorghești River
The Gheorghești River is a small river in Romania that serves as a right-bank tributary within the Olteț River basin.
-
C.
Bicaz River
The Bicaz River is a mountain river in northeastern Romania known for carving the dramatic Bicaz Gorge and flowing through the Eastern Carpathians before joining the Bistrița River.
-
D.
Strei River
The Strei River is a significant river in Transylvania, Romania, known for flowing through Hunedoara County and joining the Mureș River.
-
E.
Racova River
Racova River is a minor river in eastern Romania that serves as a tributary within the Bârlad River basin.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab64de5881908d56eb7a75c6cc69 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:24 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d915fd8dac8190928059ad2b6bbbf3 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:23 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f716afa8008190b4c518dd6004d87a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:34 a.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m.