Triple
T12157286
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LeRoy Shelton |
E289605
|
entity |
| Predicate | caseResultForDefendant |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Supreme Court held that the suspended sentence imposed on him violated the Sixth Amendment
Supreme Court held that the suspended sentence imposed on him violated the Sixth Amendment is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision clarifying that certain suspended sentences trigger the constitutional right to a jury trial.
|
E963765
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (5 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court held that the suspended sentence imposed on him violated the Sixth Amendment | Statement: [LeRoy Shelton, caseResultForDefendant, Supreme Court held that the suspended sentence imposed on him violated the Sixth Amendment]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Supreme Court held that the suspended sentence imposed on him violated the Sixth Amendment Context triple: [LeRoy Shelton, caseResultForDefendant, Supreme Court held that the suspended sentence imposed on him violated the Sixth Amendment]
-
A.
U.S. Constitution, Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees criminal defendants rights such as a speedy and public trial, an impartial jury, notice of accusations, confrontation of witnesses, compulsory process for obtaining witnesses, and the assistance of counsel.
-
B.
Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction
"Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction" refers to the final legal outcome in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s decision to overturn Alfonso Lopez Jr.’s criminal conviction, effectively clearing him of the original charges.
-
C.
Eighth Amendment
The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan was a 1985 constitutional change that significantly strengthened the powers of the president, including the authority to dissolve the National Assembly.
-
D.
Strickland v. Washington
Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
-
E.
United States v. Cronic
United States v. Cronic is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Strickland v. Washington, defines when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is presumed to be violated without needing to show specific prejudice.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Supreme Court held that the suspended sentence imposed on him violated the Sixth Amendment Triple: [LeRoy Shelton, caseResultForDefendant, Supreme Court held that the suspended sentence imposed on him violated the Sixth Amendment]
Generated description
Supreme Court held that the suspended sentence imposed on him violated the Sixth Amendment is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision clarifying that certain suspended sentences trigger the constitutional right to a jury trial.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Supreme Court held that the suspended sentence imposed on him violated the Sixth Amendment Target entity description: Supreme Court held that the suspended sentence imposed on him violated the Sixth Amendment is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision clarifying that certain suspended sentences trigger the constitutional right to a jury trial.
-
A.
U.S. Constitution, Sixth Amendment
The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees criminal defendants rights such as a speedy and public trial, an impartial jury, notice of accusations, confrontation of witnesses, compulsory process for obtaining witnesses, and the assistance of counsel.
-
B.
Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction
"Supreme Court affirmed reversal of conviction" refers to the final legal outcome in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a lower court’s decision to overturn Alfonso Lopez Jr.’s criminal conviction, effectively clearing him of the original charges.
-
C.
Eighth Amendment
The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of Pakistan was a 1985 constitutional change that significantly strengthened the powers of the president, including the authority to dissolve the National Assembly.
-
D.
Strickland v. Washington
Strickland v. Washington is a landmark 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the two-pronged test for determining when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel has been violated.
-
E.
United States v. Cronic
United States v. Cronic is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Strickland v. Washington, defines when a criminal defendant’s right to effective assistance of counsel is presumed to be violated without needing to show specific prejudice.
- F. None of above. chosen
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: caseResultForDefendant Context triple: [LeRoy Shelton, caseResultForDefendant, Supreme Court held that the suspended sentence imposed on him violated the Sixth Amendment]
-
A.
defendantStatus
Indicates the legal condition or standing of a defendant within a judicial or law-enforcement process.
-
B.
defendant
Indicates that an entity is the party accused or sued in a legal action or proceeding.
-
C.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
D.
defendantPosition
Indicates the role, stance, or location that a defendant holds within a legal case or proceeding.
-
E.
coDefendant
Indicates that two or more parties are jointly named and involved as defendants in the same legal case or proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (6 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4c6710819097a9d228382dde43 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d915d7109481908bf5fe512bba3c89 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:23 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f5f69c8d408190abbc900deb534045 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69f5fe53d47c8190896a9abf8cc4bc31 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:38 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69f5ffc563a08190b95db768df475a3a |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69d9150c18148190bf8152189c0e5fca |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m.