Triple
T12150462
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Blaj |
E289438
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedIn |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Alba County |
E298962
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Alba County | Statement: [Blaj, locatedIn, Alba County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Alba County Context triple: [Blaj, locatedIn, Alba County]
-
A.
Alba County
chosen
Alba County is an administrative region in central Romania, known for its historic city of Alba Iulia and its location in the Transylvania area.
-
B.
Galați County
Galați County is an administrative region in eastern Romania, situated along the Danube River and centered around the city of Galați.
-
C.
Mehedinți County
Mehedinți County is an administrative region in southwestern Romania, situated along the Danube River and known for its diverse landscapes and historical sites.
-
D.
Teleorman County
Teleorman County is an administrative region in southern Romania, known for its predominantly rural landscape and location within the historical region of Muntenia.
-
E.
Olt County
Olt County is an administrative region in southern Romania, known for its agricultural landscape and location along the lower course of the Olt River.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4c6710819097a9d228382dde43 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d915ae736c8190aaab05efb93c5854 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f60a80aa6881908111cc47b5fe8b9e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:49 p.m.