Triple
T12137201
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Moonta |
E289088
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSuburb |
P747
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Port Hughes |
E289784
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Port Hughes | Statement: [Moonta, hasSuburb, Port Hughes]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Port Hughes Context triple: [Moonta, hasSuburb, Port Hughes]
-
A.
Port Hughes
chosen
Port Hughes is a coastal holiday town in South Australia known for its beaches, fishing jetty, and access to the Spencer Gulf.
-
B.
Port Howard
Port Howard is the main settlement and administrative center on West Falkland in the Falkland Islands, known for its sheep farming and role as a local hub.
-
C.
Tarcoola
Tarcoola is a remote outback locality in South Australia that serves as a historic railway junction on major north–south transcontinental routes.
-
D.
Hermannsburg
Hermannsburg is a village in Lower Saxony, Germany, known for its location in the Lüneburg Heath and its historical role as a center of Protestant missionary activity.
-
E.
Port Gilbert
Port Gilbert was the original settlement that later developed into the city of Racine, Wisconsin, on the shore of Lake Michigan.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d6ab4b5e4c81909950b17151eb0951 |
completed | April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69d9158dd00c819082651891898b91bb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 3:21 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69f63ee285208190a0183e30c749f955 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:13 p.m. |
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:49 p.m.