Triple

T1213071
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause E26046 entity
Predicate heldIn P2777 FINISHED
Object Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States E4586 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States | Statement: [Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause, heldIn, Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
Context triple: [Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause, heldIn, Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States]
  • A. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States chosen
    Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by affirming Congress’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations under the Commerce Clause.
  • B. Browder v. Gayle
    Browder v. Gayle was the landmark 1956 federal court case that declared bus segregation in Montgomery, Alabama unconstitutional, effectively ending the Montgomery bus boycott and striking a major blow against Jim Crow laws.
  • C. Katzenbach v. McClung
    Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
  • D. South Carolina v. Katzenbach
    South Carolina v. Katzenbach is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, affirming broad federal power to combat racial discrimination in voting.
  • E. Buchanan v. Warley
    Buchanan v. Warley is a 1917 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Louisville racial zoning ordinance, marking an early constitutional limit on government-enforced residential segregation.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4948331fc8190b531ac9bec71c491 completed March 1, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4bde6cb608190b77fc5c47083e4b7 completed March 1, 2026, 10:29 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ac7f43a12c8190a1ba90eefafd6bbc completed March 7, 2026, 7:40 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:46 p.m.