Triple
T121015
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ministerial Conference |
E2443
|
entity |
| Predicate | canTakeDecisionsBy |
P2165
|
FINISHED |
| Object | voting in exceptional circumstances |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: voting in exceptional circumstances | Statement: [Ministerial Conference, canTakeDecisionsBy, voting in exceptional circumstances]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canTakeDecisionsBy Context triple: [Ministerial Conference, canTakeDecisionsBy, voting in exceptional circumstances]
-
A.
decidesOn
Indicates that an agent makes a choice or determination regarding a particular option, issue, or course of action.
-
B.
decides
Indicates that an entity makes a choice or determination between options, often resolving uncertainty or selecting a course of action.
-
C.
canBe
Indicates that one entity has the potential, permission, or capability to become, perform as, or be classified as another entity.
-
D.
canEnforce
Indicates that one entity has the authority or capability to compel compliance with rules, decisions, or obligations upon another entity.
-
E.
decisionType
chosen
Indicates the specific category or nature of a decision associated with an entity or event.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2506c5428819085c28a8884790e29 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:18 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a258fd278481908ad4498e03f38e2f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25647fe6081908cb0405266d35ff5 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.