Triple
T121010
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ministerial Conference |
E2443
|
entity |
| Predicate | canApprove |
P547
|
FINISHED |
| Object | accession of new WTO members |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: accession of new WTO members | Statement: [Ministerial Conference, canApprove, accession of new WTO members]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canApprove Context triple: [Ministerial Conference, canApprove, accession of new WTO members]
-
A.
approvedBy
Indicates that an action, request, or item has received formal authorization or consent from a specified entity.
-
B.
approves
chosen
Indicates that one entity formally accepts, authorizes, or agrees to a proposal, action, or decision made by another entity.
-
C.
canBe
Indicates that one entity has the potential, permission, or capability to become, perform as, or be classified as another entity.
-
D.
canEnforce
Indicates that one entity has the authority or capability to compel compliance with rules, decisions, or obligations upon another entity.
-
E.
canRefer
Indicates that one entity has the ability or permission to mention, point to, or direct attention to another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2506c5428819085c28a8884790e29 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:18 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a258fd278481908ad4498e03f38e2f |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25647fe6081908cb0405266d35ff5 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:43 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.