Triple

T12063455
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Columbus, Nevada E287232 entity
Predicate hasCounty P285 FINISHED
Object Esmeralda County E30814 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Esmeralda County | Statement: [Columbus, Nevada, hasCounty, Esmeralda County]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Esmeralda County
Context triple: [Columbus, Nevada, hasCounty, Esmeralda County]
  • A. Esmeralda County chosen
    Esmeralda County is a sparsely populated rural county in western Nevada known for its historic mining towns and vast desert landscapes.
  • B. Louisa County
    Louisa County is a rural county in southeastern Iowa known for its agricultural landscape and small communities along the Iowa and Mississippi rivers.
  • C. Louisa County
    Louisa County is a largely rural county in central Virginia known for its small towns, agricultural landscape, and proximity to Lake Anna.
  • D. Castro County
    Castro County is a rural county in the Texas Panhandle known for its agriculture-based economy and small communities.
  • E. Marengo County
    Marengo County is a rural county in west-central Alabama known for its agricultural economy, historic small towns, and location in the state's Black Belt region.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d6ab4846e081908ee7bbd66a6d3459 completed April 8, 2026, 7:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69d90440dd988190ae2b80367aceb6f7 completed April 10, 2026, 2:08 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69f67c5e9fbc819097cf9550378eabee completed May 2, 2026, 10:36 p.m.
Created at: April 8, 2026, 9:48 p.m.